|
OFWIM
> Publications >
1999 Conference Proceedings > Symposium 3 Proceedings
4th Microcomputer Applications in
Fish & Wildlife Conference
October 24-27, 1999
Stateline, Nevada
Symposium
3
Statistical
Analysis Software, Techniques, And Applications for Spatial Data
Symposium
Leader:
Kevin
Sallee
Ecological
Software Solutions
3154 53rd Street, Sacramento, CA 95820
Tel 916-456-5617 FAX 916-456-5616
ess.mail@ecostats.com
Map
Oriented Tracking Editor (MOTE), a New Tool for Editing Argos
Satellite Transmitter Data
Martha
H. Cavit, Alaska
Biological Science Center, US Geological Survey, 1011 E. Tudor Rd.,
Anchorage AK 99503
The
Map Oriented Tracking Editor (MOTE) uses ARC/INFO for UNIX to allow
investigators to edit raw satellite location data. Our data comes
from Collecte, Localisation, Satellites (CLS) and Service Argos,
Inc. whose satellites and computer systems process satellite
transmitter signals into location and sensor data. Satellite
transmitters or Platform Transmitter Terminals (PTT’s) have become
common tools in the study of ocean and air currents and in studies
of movements of animals living in remote areas. After overcoming the
challenge of attaching the PTT to the animal, the researcher needs
to reduce the voluminous data streams coming from each PTT to
meaningful data. MOTE is a two stage editing process designed to
allow a user to choose the locations that are most reliably correct
and to remove those that are erroneous or suspect.
Three
problems are addressed by the MOTE approach. . First, the many
variables in the system used to acquire satellite data can and often
do generate erroneous locations. In fact if an animal were to
traverse all of the points in the Argos data, it would have to move
at speeds of several thousand kilometers per hour. Clearly, the
erroneous data needs to be removed. Second, in about 6% of the data,
we have found that unreasonable rates of speed result from using the
wrong mathematical solution to the location calculations. Because
these solutions consist of a pair of possible locations, simply
choosing the other solution will salvage data that would otherwise
have been deleted. Finally, turning the transmitter on and off to
increase battery life, results in clumps of highly correlated data.
For statistical reasons, it is often desirable to reduce these
clumps to a single location for each transmission period or
"duty-cycle".
MOTE1.aml
solves the problem of using the wrong location-solution by
displaying the locations, one pair at a time on a background map,
allowing the user to choose the correct one. MOTE2.aml solves the
other two problems. The locations are displayed on a map, one duty
cycle at a time. The researcher deletes the erroneous data and
selects the best or most representative location for each duty cycle
using up to 11 attributes as well as rate and distance to guide the
choice.
There
are several advantages to this approach not found in other satellite
data editing techniques. It is extremely flexible. The researcher
can use all of his/her knowledge of the animal to determine the
validity of the locations even if the rule used is too complex to
automate. More data is retained. Some behaviors worth studying
inherently cause low quality location data, creating a dilemma if
location quality alone is to be used for editing. Questions
involving shorter time spans can be addressed. Movements during a
duty cycle as well as between duty cycles can be studied from the
resulting database. Finally, the MOTE interactive editing process
provides the user the opportunity to develop insight into the
animal’s behavior that might not be obvious from a more automated
process.
Application
of the Fast Fourier Transform for Bootstrap Confidence Intervals on
Kernel Density Home Range Estimators:
Methods and Computer Software
John
W. Kern* and Trent L. McDonald, Western
EcoSystems Technology Inc., 2003 Central Ave., Cheyenne WY 82001
Steven.
C. Amstrup, USGS/BRD
1011 Tudor Road, Anchorage AK
Recognition
that polar bears are shared by Canada and Alaska prompted
development of the "Polar Bear Management Agreement for the
Southern Beaufort Sea." This agreement mandated that the
harvests of polar bears from the southern Beaufort Sea (SBS) would
be split between Inupiat hunters of Alaska and Inuvialuit hunters of
Canada. It also dictated that the quota for each jurisdiction would
be reviewed annually in light of the best available scientific
information. Based on radio-telemetered bears it is known that the
utilization ranges of bears overlap jurisdictional boundaries. In
order to maintain accurate harvest estimates from each population, a
technique is needed to estimate the probability that a bear comes
from a particular jurisdiction given the location from which the
bear was harvested.
In
this paper, we develop new statistical/computational methods, and
software to estimate the probability that a bear sited (harvested)
at a particular location belongs to a particular population using
radio telemetry data. The proposed statistical method relies upon a
Kernel smoothing technique analogous to kernel density home range
estimation, although the experimental unit is based on the number of
radio-collared individuals as opposed to the number of relocations.
Confidence intervals are developed using a bootstrapping approach
where the telemetered bears are resampled with replacement and
probability of membership in a particular population is recalculated
using kernel smoothing over a set of regularly spaced pixels for
each resampling event. Kernel density estimators are computationally
expensive to calculate, and conventional computational methods would
make bootstrapping prohibitive. To avoid this computational
bottleneck, we applied the Fast Fourier Transform to efficiently
perform the kernel smoothing for each bootstrap sample. The
technique is also applicable to individual animals where bootstrap
samples are developed by resampling individual telemetry relocations
with replacement. This technique can be used to develop confidence
intervals for the utilization range.
The
Biotas™ Computer Program and its Utility for Biogeographical Data
Analysis
Kevin
Sallee, Ecological
Software Solutions, 3154 53rd Street, Sacramento, CA 95820, Tel
916-456-5617 FAX 916-456-5616, ess.mail@ecostats.com
Biotas
designed to facilitate the descriptive and statistical analysis of
biogeographical data on a PC using Windows®. Biotas offers a
extensive set of graphical, charting, and statistical techniques for
exploratory analysis and extracting statistical inferences from
spatial data quickly and easily. Possible analyses with Biotas
include creating home range contours, testing for habitat use, and
spatial and temporal statistics for spatial data and geographical
coverages. Presentations of possible home range analyses using
Biotas will include both traditional estimators such as the minimum
convex polygon and highlight more recent methods such as the
adaptive kernel and Voronoi polygons. Preliminary home range data
analysis such as utilization curves will also be presented.
Habitat
use analysis such as compositional analysis may also be performed
directly in Biotas. Biotas offers additional analytical tools for
the spatial analysis of point patterns with nearest neighbor
analysis, spatial association and co variation, tests of complete
spatial randomness, temporal and spatial autocorrelations,
permutations and simulation capabilities, and programmability.
Biotas is also a GIS program and may be used to display geographical
coverages or determine summary statistics on landscape polygons such
as perimeter to area ratios, landscape complexity indices, and
polygon summary statistics.
Query-Based
Spatial Analysis System for Triangulation and Animal Survival
Analysis
Joel
Sartwell, Missouri
Dept. of Conservation, 1110 S. College Ave., Columbia, M0 65201,
(573) 882-9880 x3245, sartwj@mail.conservation.state.mo.us
We
developed a software package to ease the collection, analysis, and
management of triangulation and survival data for animal telemetry
studies. This Window-based, highly graphical system provides an the
capability of being used in real-time field data collection
activities using a laptop through analysis of animal dispersal and
survival in either a laptop or desktop environment. Telemetry
bearings, individual sightings, and internally generated location
estimates are stored graphically as dynamic data overlays on base
maps. Locations from telemetry bearings can be estimated using
maximum likelihood, Huber m-estimator, or Andrews-m estimators. An
easy to use built-in query builder allows users to easily cull data
for plotting on a map or to perform other operations, such as batch
location estimation, convex polygon plotting, or even staggered
entry Cox Proportional Hazard or Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
This system provides an interface between ODBC compatible databases,
Geographical Information Systems (GIS), and Fortran programs for
triangulation, survival, and animal dispersal analysis. The software
allows for the import and incorporation of GIS map layers from a
wide variety of spatial data formats including: ArcView Shape,
MapInfo Vector, AutoCad DWG, TIFF Image, Windows BMP, JPEG, GIF, PCX,
etc. It also can incorporate any ODBC compatible database system.
The use of an open-database system, which includes practically all
commercially available database software, allows the user and this
software package to take full advantage of Structured Query Language
(SQL) functionality and facilitates transfer of data to other
software systems. This software provides a full set of database
management and analysis applications that meet biologists needs as
they conduct wildlife telemetry projects.
Quantifying
Spatial Patterns with the National Resources Inventory
Stephen
J. Brady*, USDA
NRCS Natural Resources Inventory & Analysis Institute , 3825 E.
Mulberry St., Ft. Collins, CO 80524, 970-498-1744; sbrady@tasc.usda.gov
Curtis
H. Flather, USDA
FS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO 80524
Dean
M. Thompson, USDA
NRCS Natural Resources Inventory & Analysis Institute, ISU,
Ames, IA
A
developing theoretical basis in landscape ecology coupled with
advancing inventory techniques, geographically-based information
systems, and computer technology have improved our ability to
conduct regional and national assessments of natural resource
issues. The 1997 National Resources Inventory (NRI) included a new
data element to capture the spatial configuration of habitat
features at each of nearly 765,000 sample locations. It is now
possible to use the NRI to quantify spatial patterns by hydrologic,
physiographic or political units and associate them with extant data
on related resources. The addition of spatial measures expands the
NRI from an inventory of national assets to a data set useful for
analysis and modeling of ecological relationships as data on
composition are enhanced with configuration. We describe computer
assisted survey information collection, data elements for habitat
composition and configuration, and demonstrate a series of spatial
measures useful for the assessment of species-habitat relationships
and for modeling the effect of USDA farm and other large-scale
programs.
Effect
of Sample Size on the Performance of Five Resource Selection Methods
Frederick
A. Leban* and Edward O. Garton, Department
of Fish & Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
83844-1136, (208) 885-6434
Michael
J. Wisdom and John G. Kie,
USDA Forest Service, Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, 1401
Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850
We
investigated the effect of sample size (number of animals and number
of locations per animal) on 5 methods of analyzing resource
selection (Neu, Friedman, Johnson, compositional analysis, and
compositional analysis on ranks). Forty-two female elk (Cervus
elaphus) were intensively monitored at the Starkey Experimental
Forest and Range in northeast Oregon from April to November 1994. We
separated the observations into 4 time periods (day, dusk, night,
dawn) for 2 seasons (spring, summer). We systematically resampled
elk locations by varying the number of animals (5, 10, 20, 30, 42)
and the number of locations per animal (10, 20, 30, 50, 100, all),
and calculated the percentage of correct conclusions (accuracy) for
1,000 runs for 6 resource types (aspect, distance to open roads,
distance to cover, distance to forage, % canopy closure, and
vegetation). Elk selection patterns were more different among
periods of the day than they were between seasons. Accuracy
increased with increasing number of animals and increasing
observations per animal for all variables. However, accuracy was low
(<60%) for few animals (5 or 10) with only 10 observations. We
recommend a minimum of 20 animals with 50 observations each during a
time of day to adequately determine resource selection for a
population during a single season.
NOTE: *
indicates presenter
|