|
OFWIM
> Publications >
1999 Conference Proceedings > General Session Proceedings
4th Microcomputer Applications in
Fish & Wildlife Conference
October 24-27, 1999
Stateline, Nevada
General
Session
Three
Dimensional Physical and Bioenergetics Habitat in Large River Systems Using
State-of-the-Art Hydroacoustics, GPS, GIS, Photogrammetry, and Computational Fluid
Dynamics
R. Craig
Addley* and Thomas B.
Hardy, Institute of Natural Systems Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-4110, (435) 797-2920, craig@aaron.cee.usu.edu
Physical habitat in riverine
ecosystems provides a template that biological processes are constrained to operate
within. Characterization of the physical template and potential changes to the
physical template in both space and time are essential for understanding many biological
processes. Unfortunately, physical habitat in riverine systems is both spatially and
temporally variable. This makes accurate characterization of the physical habitat
difficult. We show how the existing technologies of acoustic doppler current
profiling, GPS, GIS, photogrammetry and computational fluid dynamics can be combined to
accurately characterize large river systems in space and time. We also show how this
characterization can be used to assess the bioenergetics, growth, and survival potential
of riverine fishes as a function of the flow regime.
A GIS for
Wetland Management Districts
Steve Kallin,
Windom
Wetland Management District, Rt. 1, Box 273A Windom, MN 56101, (507) 831-2220, steve_kallin@mail.fws.gov
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service is responsible for the management of Waterfowl Production Areas (WPAs) and
perpetual wetland easements totaling approximately 2.5 million acres. These areas are
located throughout nine states and managed by thirty-seven Wetland Management Districts
(WMDs). The goal of this pilot project is to develop a cost effective, user friendly GIS
to assist WMDs in Minnesota with the management of lands and conservation programs.
The Wetland Management District
Geographic Information System (WMDGIS) is an extension to ArcView 3.1 GIS software. Black
and white digital orthophoto quadrangles (DOQs) produced by the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) serve as the primary base map for "on-screen" digitizing of unit
boundaries, habitat types and management accomplishments. Global positioning systems (GPS)
are also utilized to locate features not distinguishable on the DOQ image.
WMDGIS has customized dialogs
which enable users with limited GIS training to: easily access National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) data layers and DOQs; digitize new or existing habitat maps with detailed attribute
information; plan, document, summarize and evaluate management activities; import and
export GIS data layers; generate maps and report accomplishments.
Minnesota WMDs are implementing
WMDGIS and currently are concentrating on data entry. Field staff with limited GIS
experience are successfully using the system to create boundaries and detailed habitat
layers. WMDGIS has potential to be a practical and useful decision support tool for the
conservation of lands using the ecosystem approach to management.
Using a
Dynamically Segmented Hydrographic Dataset as an Aquatic Information Referencing System
Matt Freid, Pacific
States Marine Fisheries Commission, 45 SE 82nd Drive, Suite 100, Gladstone, OR
97027-2522, 503-650-5400, matt_freid@psmfc.org
The StreamNet project has
developed a regional hydrography dataset covering the states of Oregon, Washington and
Idaho. Using a unique streams identifier to build routes and to map aquatic information
using event tables, the project has assembled a variety of themes over this large area.
Mapping at a nominal 1:100,000 scale, these themes are useful in display and spatial
analysis in many applications.
Once the GIS database was
created, it has been equally useful as the underlying data structure used to reference the
23,000 + time series trends of fisheries data assembled by the project over the last five
years. Using the stream identifier and the measure values derived from the hydrography,
tables which allow for geographic queries and spatial relationships in the tabular data
have been implemented, and function independently from the GIS.
Although the resolution of GIS
layers may not be sufficient for road engineering or site assessment, they have met or
exceeded the spatial accuracy of the fisheries data associated with them. In addition, new
streams can be easily added and integrated into the dataset as specific data is added
which references a previously unmapped stream. There is an consistent flow of information
between the tabular database and the GIS, allowing for multiple modes of query, display
and analysis. The system is now functional, and has the capacity for addition and
expansion, precluding the delay and complications of progressively refining the resolution
of the hydrography. The time and expense of wholesale remapping at finer scales is great,
and as well as the effort to transfer data to these new systems, often with little
increase in value in terms of the accurate representation of the source fisheries data.
This project illustrates how hydrography used to reference aquatic information can be
created at a scale appropriate to the data, can be expanded and updated as data needs
change, and can serve to provide and unified frame of reference for both tabular and
spatial data.
Tracking
Fisheries and Water Quality Trends in the Klamath River Basin in Northwestern California
Using a Custom Database Program and GIS
Patrick Higgins*, William M.
Kier and Dr. Jan Derksen, 791 Eighth Street, Suite N, Arcata, CA 95521, (707)
822-9428, phiggins@humboldt1.com,
wkier@hooked.net,
derksen@asis.com
The Klamath River, and its
largest tributary the Trinity River, have long been famous for their salmon and steelhead
runs but in recent decades fish stocks have declined and Congress has authorized
restoration programs for each of these basins. The Klamath Resource Information System
(KRIS) was built using the Delphi programming tool and serves both the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in tracking the success of the Klamath and
Trinity Restoration Programs, respectively. The initial phases of KRIS development were
funded by the California State Water Resources Control Board which also uses the system to
monitor water quality trends. KRIS contains annotated graphs, databases, photos, web pages
and bibliographic resources and operates seamlessly with the ArcView map program. Graphs
in KRIS focus on fish, flows, aquatic macroinvertebrates, amphibians and various water
quality parameters. Photographs are organized into eight picture slide shows that can
include restoration sites, monitoring photo-points and current or historical aerial
photos. Map layers in KRIS are restricted to those having direct bearing on fisheries and
water quality. The KRIS project is distributed free on CD ROM through the USFWS Yreka
Office (530) 842-5763.
Use of
GPS-assisted Mapping of Ephemeral Cover Types to Study Habitat Use of Sympatric Foxes and
Coyotes in Agricultural Habitat
Todd E.
Gosselink*, Timothy
R. Van Deelen, and Mark Joselyn, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody
Drive, Champaign, IL, 61820, (217) 359-6187, gosselin@uiuc.edu
Richard E. Warner,
Department
of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
We conducted a habitat use study
of sympatric coyotes (Canis latrans) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in
central Illinois, using vehicle-mounted GPS units to digitally map ephemeral agricultural
cover types. GPS was used to enhance existing digital base maps and allowed for
time-sensitive mapping of various tillage practices and crop types and accurate
delineation (< 3 m error) of important micro-habitats. We used radio-telemetry to
estimate habitat use and compositional analysis to describe selection at local and
landscape scales. Coyotes and foxes had more habitat overlap during summer than during
winter at all level of analysis. Differences were due coyote preference for (and fox
avoidance of) rural grassland, cornfields, and drainage ditches. Similarly foxes preferred
(and coyotes avoided) active farmsteads. During winter, both preferred no-till soybeans
and tilled corn, and avoided active farmsteads. Coyotes preferred (and foxes avoided)
rural grassland and drainage ditches. An urban subset of our foxes also preferred urban
grassland; urban undeveloped, and urban ponds during the summer but avoided these habitats
during winter. GPS-assisted mapping proved to be an accurate and useful technique for
mapping ephemeral cover types and was instrumental in describing niche separation among
sympatric canids in the agricultural habitat of central Illinois.
Advances in
Video Technology for Wildlife Research
John J. Christensen,
Christensen
Designs, 349 Scenic Place, Manteca, CA 95337, Phone/Fax: (209) 239-5414,
cdesigns@softcom.net
The discussion of
state-of-the-art video technology and its application in wildlife research includes:
* Time-lapse videography
* Digital video-capture and storage
* Combined color and monochrome (near-infrared) video cameras
* Triggering and remote sensing
* Wireless video
The discussion will entail field
power systems (including solar) to support research in remote locations.
Development and
Implementation of a Fisheries Data Management and Analysis Program for Impoundments
Robert S. Greenlee,
Virginia
Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Suffolk, VA, 23434, 757 255-2299, rgreenlee@dgif.state.va.us
Virginia is attempting to adopt
standardized techniques for the collection and analysis of data related to fisheries
management. The Impoundments data analysis program was designed to provide a standardized
format for fisheries data management on a statewide basis, while allowing for the
flexibility in data collection and analysis that district fisheries biologists require.
The program was designed to be compatible with the various fish collection techniques
employed by agency biologists across the commonwealth, and provide standardized analysis
options and outputs. The Impoundments program has three primary functional components:
data entry, data verification, and data analysis. It provides several methods of querying
collections data based on temporal and geographic parameters, and sampling methodology.
Analytical output options include length-weight regressions, relative weight, population
indices, catch rates, size class distributions, percent total catch, and percent biomass.
The Impoundments program was developed based on input from district biologists, fisheries
program managers, and information managers. After information and analysis needs were
determined, the program was developed using Microsoft Access and Visual Basic. One year of
intensive beta testing by data entry operators and district biologists provided a feedback
loop through which updates and modifications were made. This mechanism ensured that the
program attained maximum utility and user acceptance.
The Wild Animal
and Plant Information Infrastructure (WAPITI): The Development of an Online Multistate
Wildlife Data Gateway
Nancy A. Brauer, Fish
and Wildlife Information Exchange, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
203 W. Roanoke St., Blacksburg, VA 24061-0534, (540) 231-7348, nbrauer@vt.edu
The prototype Wild Animal and
Plant Information Infrastructure (WAPITI) will allow Internet users to search the state
fish and wildlife databases of MD, PA, VA, and WV at its completion in December 1999.
WAPITI will link the states data servers, creating a regional online data network.
The objective of the project is to provide a system that meets the states individual
needs while simultaneously serving data to a regional data gateway.
A Jasmine Object Database
coordinates the multistate data. Jasmines object-oriented design is well suited for
the multidimensional relationships of wildlife data. Initially WAPITI will serve taxonomy,
distribution, status, and habitat distribution data of vertebrates and select
invertebrates. Each species record will contain links to metadata from the state servers
so users can make educated decisions about appropriate use of the data. Crosswalks between
each states nomenclature and WAPITI standards will standardize the data. Jasmine
Studio, a component of the object database, is being used to design the WAPITI web
interface. Several WebPages have been created to search for species by taxonomic class,
select species from the returned list of common names, and view individual species data.
Once completed, WAPITI will prove that several state wildlife agencies working together
can produce a regional data gateway accessible to federal agencies, scientists, students,
and the general public.
Save Time and
Resources with Efficient Database Management:
Upgrading Legacy Systems, Integrating Datasets and Maintaining Metadata
Sheryl K.
Soborowski, Fish
and Wildlife Information Exchange, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
203 W. Roanoke St., Blacksburg, VA 24061-0534, (540) 231-7348, ssoboro@mail.vt.edu
Considering the investment of
time and money spent on resource management projects and data collection, the need for
efficient storage and retrieval of project data is readily apparent. Reducing the
personnel hours spent manipulating data and improving quality of analyses is possible with
a well-conceived data management plan.
Examples from two distinct data
management projects assist in illustrating the problems, pitfalls and the rewards
of undergoing a database upgrade. The first example represents a natural resource
management solution employing user-friendly data entry and complex queries for analysis
and the second is an inventory control system for hunting/angling license distributions
with specific security and reporting requirements. The process of adopting an agency
standard database software (Microsoft Access 97 tm), upgrading data residing in legacy
formats to the Access 97 standard, integrating the stored data to alleviate cumbersome
data entry, creation of queries and reports to facilitate analyses, and production of
metadata is shown. This process has increased the value of the data collected, improved
the efficiency of analysis, freed personnel to accomplish other tasks or perform more
complex analyses, reduced duplication of efforts, and allowed for easy dissemination of
information to the public.
The initial investment of time
and resources in developing an organized data management plan provides long-term benefits.
A systematic data management system provides an organization with the opportunity to
protect their intellectual assets while standardizing to make data transferable to other
projects and agencies.
Software for
Recording and Managing Water Body Survey Data
Roger L. Parsons,
Michigan
Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, P.O. Box 30446, Lansing, Michigan
48909, (517) 335-1334, ParsonRL@state.mi.us
Water body surveys, conducted by
the Fisheries Division of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, document the
characteristics of our states aquatic resources and provide information on inhabiting
biota for effective fisheries management.
Fisheries Division developed a
software application to record water body survey data. This multi-user, windows-based
application operates in a client-server environment and uses one central relational
database. Major features include gear inventory, survey planning, survey details, reports,
field notes, and analysis. Other features include effort details, gear, site
characteristics, and catch. Scale envelopes, specimen aging, and herps observations are
also included.
The Division next looked at ways
of providing cost-effective methods for improving data quality and timeliness. Our
objective was to move data entry to the point of collection at the time of observation.
The solution was a field component that involves hand-held Pentium class computers that
accept input primarily via electronic pen and eventually voice. These computers are rugged
and withstand extreme environmental operating conditions.
Surveys are planned on the
central system and then downloaded to the hand-held computer. Data is recorded throughout
the survey and GPS is utilized to record gear set locations. Once the field data is
uploaded to the central system it is immediately available for use in managing our natural
resources.
FishXing -
Software for Fish Passage Through Culverts
Susan Firor*,
PO Box
4173, Arcata, CA 95518, 707-822-1959 (Phone & Fax), firor@humboldt1.com
Michael Love*,
Watershed
Center, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501, mlove@northcoast.com
Robert
Gubernick, USFS -
Petersburg Ranger District, PO Box 309, Petersburg, AK 99833, Gubernick_Robert/r10_stikine@fs.fed.us
Throughout the Pacific Northwest
and Alaska the assessment of fish passage at road crossing structures has become an issue
of great concern. Thousands of culverts are currently installed in fish-bearing streams
around the world, many of which are partial or total barriers to fish migration. Since the
expense of remediation is high, it is necessary to properly design culverts, assess the
range of passage at existing culverts, and plan the best remediation strategy. The
determination of fish passage is complex requiring a broad knowledge of hydraulic
engineering, fisheries biology, and hydrology
FishXing is an interactive
software package written by the Watershed Interactions Team of the Six Rivers National
Forest. The software runs on Windows 95/98 or NT systems.
FishXing is intended for use by
fish biologists, hydrologists, and culvert design engineers. The program allows the user
to compare culvert designs within a single project. Uniform and gradually varying flow
calculations can be made for various shaped and embedded culverts. Assessment is performed
based on swimming speed, swim duration time, and water velocity for any species with known
swimming abilities. Outputs include percent passable flows, hydraulic properties within
the culvert, and reasons for migratory barriers.
Advanced
Techniques Employing State-of-the-Art Audio Technologies for Wildlife Research (recording
and playback)
John J. Christensen,
Christensen
Designs, 349 Scenic Place, Manteca, CA 95337, (209) 239-5414, cdesigns@softcom.net
This overview of the
state-of-the-art technologies available for wildlife research includes a review of
methods for conducting wildlife research using audio recording and playback
technology. The advantages of newer technologies, such as digital (CD/MD) over older
technologies (analog tape) will be discussed.
The California
Wildlife Habitat Relationships System
Monica
Parisi*, California
Wildlife Habitat Relationships Program, California Department of Fish and Game, 1807 13th
Street, Suite 202, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 327-8822, mparisi@dfg.ca.gov
Mollie Hurt*,
District
Wildlife Biologist, Tahoe National Forest, P.O. Box 95, Sierraville, CA 96126, (530)
994-3401, hurt_mollie/r5_tahoe/@fs.fed.us
The California Wildlife Habitat
Relationships System (CWHR) has predictive habitat-relationships models for 675 regularly
occurring terrestrial vertebrates in California. Each species model has suitability
ratings for three life-requisites breeding, cover and feeding for habitat types and seral
stages from a standardized habitat classification system. Each species is also modeled for
its geographic distribution, seasonal use of locations and habitats and use of 124 habitat
elements. Elements include live and decadent vegetation elements such as snags, physical
elements such as banks and burrows, aquatic elements, vegetative and animal diet elements
and human-made elements.
The California Wildlife Habitat
Relationships Version 7.0 software application comes compiled in Visual-Dbase for use in
Windows 95, 98 or NT operating systems. Users can manipulate the modeled variables to
produce nine types of reports, including a species composition comparison between two
habitat conditions and a habitat value or suitability comparison between two conditions.
The CWHR model and its major
assumptions are presented and a sample query from the Version 7.0 software demonstrated.
Also presented is the use of CWHR in a comparative analysis of five forest management
alternatives for the Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act
Environmental Impact Statement. [in progress]
Using
Transactional Voice Technology to Improve Wisconsin's Lake Michigan Fishery
Bradley T.
Eggold, Fisheries
and Habitat Protection, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Plymouth, Wisconsin
53073, (920) 892-8756, eggolb@dnr.state.wi.us
Current information on the
species composition of the charter fishing industry catch and close monitoring of the
commercial fishing industry is crucial to policy decisions regarding the Lake Michigan
fishery. Current collection of fisheries data from charter boat captains requires them to
submit their reports (i.e. effort and harvest information) by the 10th of each month for
the previous months fishing activities on forms provided by the Department. A solution to
the current method would be to use "transactional voice technology". This allows
the charter captain to report their harvest over the phone with the data being directly
loaded into database. A test of the system was implement in July and August of 1997 with
20-30 current charter captains. Reactions to the new system ranged from mild dislike to
overwhelming support. Further tests and discussions were warranted from this initial test.
In addition, Wisconsin is currently re-writing commercial fishing laws. Several key
components for the new monitoring plan call for commercial fishermen to call in by phone
prior to leaving the dock and 30 minutes prior to landing. Transactional voice technology
will be used to record these calls and allow Law Enforcement and fisheries personnel
real-time access to the data so that valuable Lake Michigan species (i.e. yellow perch)
can be protected.
Use the
Internet to Engage Your Constituents!
Rebecca K. Wajda,
Virginia
Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, 4010 West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia
23230-1104, (804) 367-8351, bwajda@dgif.state.va.us
Historically, state fish and
wildlife agencies have used public meetings and individual solicitations to involve their
constituencies in regulatory processes and program activities. These procedures, while
often effective in motivating selected publics, do not take advantage of new technologies
and can exclude impacted constituencies that do not routinely interact with the agency.
The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries has begun to use the Internet as a
means for actively engaging a wider range of groups in the affairs of the agency. During a
recent regulatory process involving the setting of hunting and trapping seasons, the
Department implemented an online opinion survey form that sought feedback on the proposals
and a related subject. The agency received more than 900 responses using this survey
instrument. The Department is also using its web site to provide an electronic bulletin
board where the angling communities can post and share fishing experiences across the
state. This tool is quite popular and effective in supplementing the agency's weekly
Fishing Report, providing more timely details about specific fishing "hot
spots." Another very effective use of the web site is the electronic submission of
data for the Department's WildlifeMapping program. Initially, WildlifeMappers
submitted data via paper form or export file generated from an Access database
application. The web-based process facilitates data entry directly into the primary
application, reducing staff effort and minimizing data transfer errors. In all three
cases, the Department has used the Internet to engage constituents in activities and
interactions outside of those they are required to (e.g., purchasing a license,
registering a boat) and provide further opportunities for interaction with the agency. The
web site can be viewed at http://www.dgif.state.va.us.
Marine Angler
Survey Management and Reporting via the Internet
Wade H. Van
Buskirk, Pacific
States Marine Fisheries Commission, 45 SE 82nd Drive, Suite 100, Gladstone, OR 97027-2522,
(503) 650-5400, HTTP://www.psmfc.org/~wade
The objective of the
Recreational Fisheries Information Network (RecFIN) is to gather and report marine
recreational catch and effort data for the Pacific coast. The primary data gathering task
is the annual field sampling of approximately 30,000 angler trips using the Marine
Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS). The primary reporting task is the
generation of MRFSS catch and effort estimates and merging of other Pacific state's catch
and effort estimates into the database.
Many operations of the sampling
and estimation programs have been centralized on the RecFIN system. There are SAS
database, FTP and HTTP servers are used by state supervisors to upload site sampling
frames and sampler metadata, generate stratified random sampling assignments, monitor the
quality and quantity of data flow, and generate metadata reports on sampling conduct.
Fishery managers also have a selection of query tools available on the Internet to
tabulate, summarize, plot and forecast catch and effort data.
These tools have significantly
increased quality and timeliness of the data, reduced the need for responding to
individual requests for data, and improved oversight of project conduct. There is now more
time available to pursue other improvements.
WDNR's Aquatic
Metadata Search on the Internet
Don Fago, Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources, 1350 Femrite Dr., Monona, WI 53716, 608/221-6366,
fagod@dnr.state.wi.us
The objective of this study was
to create an Internet application that would allow people from within and without the WDNR
to determine who has aquatic related data from Wisconsin. A two-page questionnaire for
WDNR aquatic personnel and an MS Access database was first developed. We then created a
corresponding Oracle database for querying via the Intranet or Internet. Getting WDNR
personnel to fill out a questionnaire for each of their aquatic databases has been the
hardest and most crucial part of this project. It has been important to stress to these
people that we are not furnishing anyone access to any of the actual databases. The
database we have created is metadata about each database for which they have filled out a
questionnaire. The Intranet application has one main query screen from which one can
select one of 10 aquatic subjects. Each of these has a screen for selecting databases with
specific information and then a detailed screen showing all information about that
particular database. Each screen also has its own metadata to help explain what is on each
screen.
This spring the Aquatic Metadata
Search was moved to our Internet site:
http://oraweb.dnr.state.wi.us:/inter1/plsql/pk_swis_org_metadata.org_metadata_navigate,
and we are in the process of sending out
questionnaires to other state and federal agencies in Wisconsin who might have aquatic
databases.
Web-based
Planning Systems: Guidance at Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia
Stacy McNulty*,
Fish and
Wildlife Information Exchange, Virginia Tech, 203 W. Roanoke St., Blacksburg, VA 24061,
smcnulty@vt.edu
Robert H. Giles, Jr.,
Professor
Emeritus, Virginia Tech, 504 Rose Avenue, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, rhgiles@vt.edu
Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) and Database Management Systems (DBMS) are increasingly important tools in natural
resource management. However, they can be difficult for biologists and managers to use
because of several characteristics. Software and hardware require training and are
expensive to purchase and maintain. Traditionally, maps and reports are static and rarely
useful for multiple applications. Raw data are usually not available, or there is no
information about the quality or source of the data. We have developed a web-based
planning system, Guidance, that utilizes the power of the Internet to allow custom
mapping and data analysis in a GIS. We used the natural resource database of Fort A.P.
Hill, Virginia as a model.
Guidance is different
from the traditional GIS in that the data and software resides on a server accessed by the
user via a web interface. We integrated the Fort A.P. Hill database in Microsoft AccessTM
with ArcView Internet Map ServerTM (a GIS with dynamic mapping capabilities).
The Guidance menu acts as a table of contents, with hyperlinks to the original
data, maps, metadata, and related information. The user chooses which species or
physiographic data to analyze, selects database records, and receives a map or report,
without knowing software or programming languages. We will illustrate how to perform
queries and generate maps and tables using Guidance. We will discuss the benefits
of Guidance, as well as development and maintenance issues for web-based planning
systems.
Virginia's
Wildlife Information Online
Kathy
Quindlen, VA Dept.
of Game & Inland Fisheries, 4010 W. Broad St., Richmond, VA 23230-1104, kquindlen@dgif.state.va.us
Virginia Department of Game and
Inland Fisheries has recently completed the migration of its system of wildlife databases
to a World Wide Web ("web") application. From 1994 until late 1998, the Wildlife
Information Online Service ("Service") was accessible through modem dial-in to
the Agency's computers. Now that the Service is available through the web, it is more
widely accessible to Agency staff, other government agency users, consultants, private
industry, and the general public, resulting in an increase in Service use. Each category
of user has its own access privileges, so that sensitive data are protected. The Service
is also easier to use and requires less training due to the mouse-driven interface. New
mapping capabilities, including point-and-click location selection and zooming in or out,
makes the Service more functional and versatile. The mapping functions allow the user to
select any geographic point within Virginia and conduct a search for known and likely
wildlife resources around that point, or up- or down-stream along a warm water stream.
Information compiled for a site includes occurrences of threatened and endangered species,
all wildlife species, cold water streams (including trout streams), anadromous fish, and
state-owned lands. Reports may be customized to suit the user's needs. Maps of species
occurrences may also be viewed and printed. In addition to the geographic searching
features, the Service provides complete species information on over 2,000 species found in
the Commonwealth. The Service is accessed from the Agency's main web page at
www.dgif.state.va.us through the hyperlink Wildlife
Information Online.
Information
Strategic Planning for Fisheries Resource Management
Christine L. Larson,
Michigan
Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division. P.O. Box 30047, Lansing, Michigan
48909, (517) 373-8027, LarsonC@state.mi.us
Rising software and database
development project costs (tangible and intangible) force managers to closely examine
potential projects. Projects must be carefully matched to long-range goals, both on the
technology and fisheries program management fronts. Limited resources must be applied to
the most beneficial projects.
In 1996, Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, developed an information strategic planning process
that closely integrates program objectives defined in the agency strategic management plan
to information systems requirements.
The Information Strategic Plan
documents the strategic direction and execution of our Information Management Program. It
provides a baseline for information management decision-making and defines a course
direction for planning and creating software applications and databases. The information
strategic process tracks accomplishments and on-going activity directly related to the
Information Management Program's execution. Dependencies between applications and
databases are also documented.
The methodology and process has
been in use for three annual planning cycles, and continues to be a valuable information
management planning tool. With our proven methodology, potential and active projects are
easily evaluated for impact on fisheries management program objectives, data sharing
opportunities across the agency's fisheries management programs and organizational impact.
Creating and
following a Paperless Trail - CRiS the Columbia River Information System
Stephen M. Pastor,
U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service, 9317 Highway 99 Suite I, Vancouver, WA 98665, 360 696-7605,
stephen_pastor@mail.fws.gov
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
hatcheries and fisheries offices in the Columbia River Basin have been using database
methods to collect and manage information since the 1980's. The collection of database
files and programs is known as CRiS - the Columbia River information System. Record
keeping begins with standard database files used to record information during spawning and
egg development. Hatchery activity is recorded in files for mortality, feeding, growth,
sample counts, and movement of fry or fingerlings between tanks or raceways. Coded-wire
tagging and fin clipping are also recorded in database files. All of these files are used
by a PondInv program to update information in the Pond Inventory file, but also form a
Paperless Trail that can be followed back to a group of adults.
Fisheries offices create files
with information on both the original returning adults and the progeny of those adults.
Additional information is recovered from interagency databases up to eight years after
spawning occurred. Retrieval of information pertinent to any group of released fish,
including the number and size of adults spawned to create that group, through the
production phase, and, eventually, recoveries in coast wide fisheries, is possible by
running programs that follow the Paperless Trail.
Wisconsin's
Internet based Propagation System, ActiveX meets Fish
T. Douglas Beard, Jr.,
Bureau
of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources,
Post Office Box 7921, Madison, Wisconsin 53703, (608) 267-9427, beardt@mail01.dnr.state.wi.us
Fisheries resources agencies
have made propagation programs an integral part of their management system. Propagation
systems are similar to many factory systems, such that inventory control methodologies can
be used to manage information. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has
hatcheries and propagation personnel located throughout the state, many have limited
access to department information servers. However, all department personnel have access to
the Internet. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources is currently in the process of
developing and deploying an Internet based system to manage and access all information
related to fisheries propagation. This system will use active server pages to capture all
data related to management of the propagation system. Management of data and production of
reports is accomplished using SQL server 7.0. This system will allow managers to identify
stocking demand, defined as quotas through an Internet interface. Planning for production
each year will be done and tracking of supply (fish) will be accomplished through lot
history reports managed through the Internet. Finally, delivery of product (stocking
receipts) will be tracked through this system. Finally, the public and department
personnel can access reports of number of fish stocked in each lake. Full-scale
implementation will be occur in January 2000.
NRIS Fauna:
Organizing, Displaying, and Analyzing Wildlife Data To Support Forest Service Planning and
Management
Chris Frye*,
USDA Forest
Service, 1720 Peachtree Road, Atlanta, GA 30367, (404) 347-2402, cfrye/r8@fs.fed.us
Jim
Fenwood*, Ecosystem
Management Coordination, USDA Forest Service, 1323 Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, (707)
562-8719, jfenwood/r5@fs.fed.us
Tom DeMeo,
NRIS Terra, USDA
Forest Service, 16400 Champion Way, Sandy, OR 97055, (503) 668-1419, tdemeo/wo_sandy@fs.fed.us
More than ever, use of National
Forest resource data in a corporate approach is critical in addressing biodiversity
concerns at multiple scales. To this end, the U.S. Forest Service is developing the
Natural Resources Information System (NRIS). NRIS is composed of terrestrial ecological
(Terra), field-sampled vegetation (FSVeg), aquatic (Water), air resource (Air), and
wildlife (Fauna) data modules. Fauna, the wildlife component of NRIS, is under
development. Fauna organizes wildlife occurrence data and metadata in a distributed
database structure with ORACLE (tabular) and geographic information system (GIS) (spatial)
components. Features include easy spatial display, a variety of querying options, and a
framework for biological evaluations (the BE Wizard). A prototype is scheduled for
November 1999, and a released version is expected in late 2000.
Targeted users are wildlife
biologists, ecologists, and other resource specialists. Applications include planning,
inventory, monitoring, effects analysis, and implementation; species conservation and
recovery strategies; and ecosystem assessments at multiple scales. Because close
cooperation with other organizations is critical in effective use of wildlife data, Fauna
will feature links to other databases, including Heritage/Nature Conservancy ranking and
occurrence records, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rankings, and other sources. Habitat
data, rare plants, and plant community data will be obtained from the NRIS Terra module;
aquatic data will be obtained from NRIS Water.
Using
Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Large Scale Seabird and Environmental Databases, the
Internet/WWW and Spatial Statistics to Investigate Seabird-Habitat Relationships in the
Northwest Atlantic
F. Huettmann* and
A.W.
Diamond, Atlantic Cooperative Wildlife Ecology Research Network
(ACWERN), University
of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 45111, Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B 6E1, Tel. (+1) (506) 452
6033, Fax (+1) (506) 453 3538, k9wk@unb.ca,
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Quad/5377/index.html
Seabirds can be used as
indicators for the ocean. Data in the PIROP (Programme Intégré des Recherches sur les
Oiseaux Pélagiques) database, covering 25 years of seabird at-sea observations in the
Northwest Atlantic, and 20 environmental data sets from a variety of sources (e.g. NOAA,
ETOPO5, COADS-WOA) downloaded from the WWW/Internet or other digital pathways were
combined to build a descriptive and predictive seabird distribution model with a
Geographic Information System (SPANS-GIS) for the winter and breeding seasons. Significant
predictors were selected with a logistic regression model (glm) and further analyzed with
a Classification and Regression Tree (Cart). In order to evaluate the seabird breeding
distribution model we applied an additional data set, seabird colony locations from Canada
and Greenland, and evaluated the model output. Our models and approaches allow the
investigation of seabird and marine habitat relationships, colony distances and foraging
ranges across scales. We show that our model also has potential for forecasting seabird
distribution, e.g. in an oil spill scenario, or in a global change scenario which would
affect the atmosphere, sea surface temperatures and currents. Based on Landscape Ecology
approaches multivariate GIS-Statistics show how the environmental data can be used to
stratify the habitat for future studies.
Geospatial
Information Usage in Kenya
Luke Odhiambo
Ouko, P.O.
BOX 48955, Nairobi, Kenya, Phone: 254-2-253751, Fax: 254-2-253752, louko@hotmail.com
The elephant and rhino
populations in Kenya have continued to dwindle at an alarming rate during the last two
decades. The effects of poaching, land use conflict, forest fires and hostile weather
conditions have adversely affected the population growth of both animals. Pollution in the
Indian Ocean and hazardous fishing practices produce major problems in the industry.
This paper describes the current
usage of geospatial information sources in negating the decimation of the two animal
populations. It will provide insights into the successes and failures of past and ongoing
programs in population studies, ecology analysis, disaster prediction and mitigation,
conservation law enforcement and general administration of the Masaai Mara Game Park. An
analysis of GIS use in studying the fisheries industry on the Indian Ocean will be
considered.
The paper will provide solutions
for optimizing the current programs within the confines of available geospatial
information resources. Solutions on how to enhance the general usage of microcomputer
applications will be provided as well as potential areas of new usage and the application
of even newer technologies.
Doing GIS in a
Distributed Environment: OpenGIS
Prakash
Narayan, Mineral
Resources Department, Suva, Fiji Islands, Private Mail Bag Suva, Fiji islands, Phone:
(679) 381 611 extension 408, prakash@mrd.gov.fj or
prakash@lgs.jussieu.fr
In this era of rapidly changing
technology, organizations that depend on Geographic Information(GI) and geoprocessing need
to continuously evaluate, acquire, and refresh their technology. Spatial data
infrastructure applications increasingly rely on massive, distributed geodata libraries.
Traditional Geographic Information Systems(GIS) do not address the requirements of complex
digital environmentally distributed libraries. The OpenGIS is unprecedented in the world
of geoprocessing, but it is based on prior and ongoing Information Technology(IT)
initiatives that seek to provide "interoperability." Likewise, the OpenGIS
itself is unprecedented in the world of geoprocessing, but it is a special application of
existing distributed computing technology and object technology which are evolving
rapidly, partly through the efforts of common interoperability initiatives. OpenGIS is
defined as transparent access to heterogeneous geodata and geoprocessing resources in a
networked environment. The goal of OpenGIS is to provide a comprehensive open interface
framework that enable developers to write interoperating components that provide these
capabilities. Information Technology(IT)as a whole, is going through drastic changes. The
explosion of interest in the Internet and the introduction and wide acceptance of the
World Wide Web(WWW) are all signs of this. These changes offer the area of Geographic
Information Systems(GIS) some large and not-to-be-ignored possibilities. In order to take
full advantage of these possibilities, however, the current isolationist approach to GIS
applications has to change. Introduction, OpenGIS, Information Technology(IT),
Object-Orientated, Components of OpenGIS, Conclusion and Bibliography.
NOTE: *
indicates presenter
|